![]() |
| Leonardo da Vinci's Codex Leicester, via Wikimedia Commons |
I have been nervous and anxious in anticipation of the boards. I did not intensely study science in undergrad, much as my peers did, so is that setting me up for failure? That led me down a rabbit hole of articles about the correlation between USMLE scores and... pretty much anything under the sun.
Mount Sinai, perhaps the leader in medical humanities, has a nice literature review about this very topic. I am most interested in the section about undergraduate humanities majors.
"We found that H&M students were more likely to have academic difficulties during the preclinical years, but by the third year, they were, as a group, indistinguishable academically from their classmates with traditional premedical backgrounds on the basis of clerkship performance... We found that H&M students were more likely to have academic difficulties during the preclinical years, but by the third year, they were, as a group, indistinguishable academically from their classmates with traditional premedical backgrounds on the basis of clerkship performance."And then comes the part about USMLE scores:
"No difference was found in "the United States Medical Licenscing Examination (USMLE) examination... between the science and non-science majors."The article goes on to discuss other good things about a humanities education, such as how it positively affects empathy brought to the patient-doctor relationship. That's all fine and dandy - I expected those conclusions - but for now I can breathe a sigh of relief about board exams! My background does not negatively correlate with these exam scores!
Gotta get cracking.


No comments:
Post a Comment